Category Archives: edushare

But Why?

Our internal monologue is programmed to make judgements and connections about the world around us. We almost create stories in our head about what people are doing and why. These “causes” that we create are called attributions. These attributions that we assign to different situations are what decide how we react and interpret behaviour, either our own or the behaviour of others.

There are many different aspects of attribution theory, and Weiner describes 3 different dimensions:

Locus – the location of responsibility
- Internal – believes self to be the cause
  - genetics etc
- External – believes cause lies in the environment around them
  - family, luck etc

Stability – duration
- Stable – fixed, unchanging situation
  - outcome likely to stay the same
- Unstable – changeable, not constant
  - outcome likely to be different

Control
- Controllable – has ability to change behaviour
  - personally accountable
- Uncontrollable – unable to change/affect what is happening
  - blames other people or luck etc

The above image is a simplistic model, but explains the correlation between these factors quite well. For example, if a person believes they are what affects test scores (internal) and that their test scores are always similar (stable), then they believe the cause of this is a natural ability for maths. However, if a person believes that other people are the reason for their success or failure (external), and their results are often varied (unstable), then the person will put their success or failure down to luck (or lack of it).

These attributions often correlate with one’s emotions, or affective responses.

This table shows how both internal and external attributions can affect how we feel about our success or failure, for example, if we feel that we have cause our success then we feel proud of ourselves and confident for future attempts. However, if we feel that we have ourselves caused failure, then we feel guilty and unlikely to have a positive outlook on future experiences. Using experiences and attributes in this manner is called expectancy beliefs – where our motivation for future attempts is affected by the outcome of our current attempt. A feeling of confidence in out ability at this stage will motivate us to try further activities.

Motivation plays a huge role in attribution theory – the attributes we give behaviours can affect how motivated we are to repeat these behaviours. This is often linked to the perceived vs the actual attributes of a situation i.e. how a person themselves sees the situation.

Motivation is split into two strands: intrinsic and extrinsic. Intrinsic motivation is the type we should try to instill into our pupils – a desire to do something for the goal of achievement and knowing you have completed the task. Extrinsic is the opposite of this, where reward systems are put in place, so the goal of a task is to complete is to get the reward. It is often this type of motivation that is seen in schools through the use of sticker charts and points systems. The motivation we have, and ultimately the students in our classes have, determines how we approach future tasks.

The clip below outlines attribution theory and looks at it from a teacher’s perspective:

A Sixth Sense

Leave a reply

Piaget believed that children were born with no cognitive understanding of mathematics, or “numerosity” – the ability to understand small quantities (Marmasse, Bletsas and Marti 2000). However, more recent research has shown that children of just a few months old understand very small quantities, distinguishing between 2 and 3 items, but not between 4 and 6, showing their understanding is not fully formed (Starkley et al 1990).This ability proves that infants are born with an innate number sense.

There are many different number systems, outlined in the article by Marmasse, Bletsas and Marti (2000), dating back to prehistoric times. When writing was invented, there became symbols which represented this ability to count. These symbols we call tags. The easier these tags are, the easier it is for children to learn to count. For example in China, 15 is spoken as “ten five” and in French, 92 is spoken as “four twenty twelve” (as in 4 times 20 and then add on 12). This system is helpful when it comes to teaching children place value.

Marmasse, Bletsas and Marti’s (2000) article also describes the 5 principles of counting, outlined by Gelman and Galistel (1978). It is these principles that young children must grasp in order to count accurately:

One to One
- one counting tag for each item
  - One, Two, Three NOT One, Two, Two.
Stable Order
- counting tag order must be repeated and consistent (not as below)
  - Counting 3 items – One, Two, Four
  - Counting 4 items – One, Four, Three, Five
Cardinal
- last tag represents the cumulative amount of items
  - If counting the apples, you know that once you have counted 10, that the ten applies to the total of the apples, not the specific last apple you counted.
Abstraction
- anything can be counted
  - from age 2/3 children can count groups of mixed items
Order Irrelevance
- doesn’t matter where you start counting from (left, right, top, bottom)
  - This skill doesn’t emerge until age 4/5

Early counting involves using manipulatives i.e. fingers or toys. This then progresses onto verbal counting, removing these prompts with children counting in their heads, and eventually being able to recall facts from memory. For example, we all know that 3+7 = 10 without actually having to count on 3 from 7.

The part of the article that particularly resonated with me was where they discussed different teaching approaches. Marmasse, Bletsas and Marti discuss the two different teaching approaches as “traditional” and “constructivist”. These two approaches are much the same as Skemp’s instumental and relational teaching (as discussed in my previous blog available at https://blogs.glowscotland.org.uk/glowblogs/myeportfolioekma1/2016/09/23/316/).

It is clear that, while Piaget was partially correct in saying children are not born with any mathematical ability, numerosity is both innate and developed through learning experiences. There are some principles of basic mathematics that cannot be developed until around age 4/5, however, Piaget’s belief that it is not until age 8 that children develop a mature number sense has been clearly disproved by theorists such as Starkey. This is an important factor to consider in the classroom, and I will take this forward in teaching maths in school. Children are more capable than they are given credit for in mathematics, and I intend to use this knowledge and try more complex lessons and mathematical discoveries in future.

References

Marmasse, N., Bletsas, A. and Marti, S. (2000) Numerical Mechanisms and Children’s Concept of Numbers. Available at http://web.media.mit.edu/~stefanm/society/som_final.html (accessed on 1/12/16)

Starkey, P., Spelke, E.S., and Gelman, R. (1990). Numerical abstraction by human infants. Cognition, 36: 97-127.

There’s Been a Murder!

Leave a reply

In the clip below, Dan Walton (Teacher of the Year) is teaching his class Pythagoras. My memories of pythagoras at school mainly involve textbooks, much like most other maths topics in high school. We were taught the rule and how to apply it (instrumental understanding) and given textbook work to consolidate our knowledge. However, Dan’s approach to teaching this topic is very different.

Pythagoras is the rule that the squares of the shorter two sides with equal the square of the shortest side – a²+b²=c². Rather than simply teaching this rule to his class, he has them find out the answer. Some of the children simply draw the triangle to scale, giving them the correct answer, others must work out the rule using numbers. This is giving the children multiple ways to solve the problem and they then realise that the formula is more efficient than drawing triangles every time. By having the children investigate this rule for themselves, Dan instantly has the children engaged in the lesson.

By using a real life example (golf hole), Dan is showing the children the context of this learning in the world outside of the classroom. He gives them the option to solve the problem any way they want, allowing them to choose between the two methods they have explored. All of the children opted for the formula method, showing their ability to select an appropriate method for solving a problem.

When Dan then moves on to working out the length of a shorter side, he has a small piece of paper showing the rules of pythagoras, but does not tell the children anything about what they have to do. This investigation and discovery really has the children engaged and involved in the lesson in a way that a textbook cannot do. The children are working out what they must do – they are taking control of their own learning. By giving the children the opportunity to do this, Dan is helping them with long term problem solving skills. The children learn that the answer is not going to be given to them, they must work it out themselves.

The climax of the lesson, drawing on all the pythagoras they have learned, is a murder mystery problem. There are multiple pythagoras questions which they must solve in order to find out who the murderer is etc. This is an incredible way to find out if the children have taken in all that has been taught. If the children can find out the answer, then they understand the rules of pythagoras that they have been taught. Dan even hides some of the questions around the school to bring some energy and movement to the lesson. There is no doubt that this is substantially more rewarding for children than sitting at a desk with a textbook.

While pythagoras may be a more advanced topic than those of primary mathematics, I believe that many lessons can be learned from Dan’s lesson. Children should be encouraged to explore numbers and mathematics, rather than being told a rule and applying it. If they can work the rules out for themselves, not only are they much more likely to remember it, but they are more likely to enjoy this learning. While we cannot allow primary children to run around the school looking for questions, it is important that we allow them to have active maths, even taking them outside as a class into the playground to solve some problems will be much more engaging and exciting than a normal maths lesson. Dan also does not share the learning intention with the children at the start of the lesson, again, promoting discovery and exploration. I believe that this is even more important in a primary classroom as allowing children to find out what they are learning themselves shows that they have actually understood what is being taught.

In my future maths lessons, I want to incorporate some of these techniques, especially taking learning outdoors. Maths does not need to be sitting in front of a textbook. Maths should be a wonderful, exciting discovery of the whys and hows of numbers – an idea all too often overlooked in the primary classroom.

Lost in Number Translation

Leave a reply

Skemp suggests that there are 2 types of understanding: instrumental and relational.

Instrumental understanding – Not quite about playing the piano, but I think the analogy applies. Instrumental understanding is like knowing the notes to play, but not knowing the tune – in maths terms, it is about knowing the rules, formulas and processes to get an answer, but not knowing the underlying concepts. This method is easier to understand and children get to see the results of their learning quicker, giving them a sense of success that children, like all of us, are excited by. These reasons are why it is understandable that teachers use instrumental understanding in the classroom. If there are upcoming tests or exams, it is quicker and easier to teach this way if it is a subject they simply need to know. A teacher may also feel that the children have not developed skills that are needed to understand relational thinking, the other type of understanding described by Skemp.

Relational understanding is a more complex affair, however, the long term effects are substantially worthwhile. It is about knowing why you are using a certain rule and the concepts beneath the strategy, i.e. why two negatives make a positive. This approach is more adaptable to new tasks and is easier to remember in the long term. Relational understanding is knowing all of the connections across mathematical topics.

Skemp uses the analogy of a town to explain the difference between these two approaches. You can walk through town knowing your route from A to B and a few other routes nearby to get to the essential places you need (instrumental) or you can create a “cognitive map” of the town in your head, knowing all the routes and which is best for your journey (relational). If you can master the second approach, then you will never be lost.

References

Skemp, R. (1976) Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. Mathematics Teaching. Available at https://alearningplace.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Skemp-paper1.pdf (Accessed 23/09/16)

Clever’s New Friends

Leave a reply

Stories are a great way to introduce new concepts or feelings to young children, especially in Early Years (primary and nursery). Children may recognise the feelings of the main character in the story as feelings they have felt in their lives, however, young children struggle to communicate their feelings – emotion words are often learned last. Stories provide children another land to get lost in as they follow the main character and find out how they deal with their problems. The child, knowingly or not, will be able to take messages from the story and use them when they find themselves in this situation.

There are lots of different “social stories” that target specific issues children may be having such as loss/grief, anger issues or loneliness. There are also stories like this for children with Autism and other learning difficulties, which may help them cope with problems they might have in daily school life.

The below clip shows a social story about using polite words and being nice to others:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1WJnbJDTS0

In the story Clever’s New Trick, we see the story of Clever the fox who has problems with his temper. This leaves him lonely as no one wants to play with him. Jerome the Gnome teaches Clever a trick to help with this – Stop and Think. He uses this trick with some of the other animals, practicing controlling his temper and playing with his new friends successfully.

While this teaches the lesson of controlling their emotions, it also teaches the children that everyone is learning things – nobody is perfect i.e. Snowy Owl is still learning how to fly well. This story could be used in Early Years quite easily with the right preparation.

There are some words in the story that young children will not know i.e. hesitant and remorseful. As children will be fixated on these new words, it would be useful to use these words prior to telling the story, a few hours or days before. This that the children are still learning these new words, but can still focus on the story. It is also important to have questions to ask the children throughout the story, such as asking them to predict what will happen next. This involves children in the story telling process, stopping them from simply being passive listeners. It is essential to plan these questions in advance, as it is unlikely that suitable, high-level questions will be thought up on the spot. It is also important that children have the chance to ask questions of their own. This consolidates their learning and allows them to fully understand the story, which is especially important if there are follow up activities based on the story.

Stories are essential in the classroom, and are often overlooked as something to do to fill in time, or to calm the children after playtime. While stories can relax the children, it is important not to simply use them as a filler activity. Story time should be planned as much as any other lesson in order to get the most out of them and to develop key literacy skills in children such as prediction, analysis and merely an enjoyment of stories and reading.

“So please, oh PLEASE, we beg, we pray, go throw your TV set away. And in its place you can install, a lovely bookshelf on the wall.”

Leave a reply

Reading is often an important step for children, and parents. Children are pushed through school reading books and literacy programs, sometimes losing the enjoyment they may have once had for reading and language itself.

Early reading for children is not so much reading, as recognition, usually of signs, logos, and other environmental print around them.

There is some debate as to whether children should start reading sooner or later. One study in support of children reading earlier is Kraus’ 2015 study where they had devised a test which could predict a child’s language ability and even whether they may have trouble reading in the future (News article of study available at http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2015/07/21/423260864/the-test-that-can-look-into-a-childs-reading-future utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20150721)

While this study may help to draw attention to those who may need assistance in language, I worry that it will isolate those who do well in the test. If a parent knows that their child will not have any difficulty in language and reading, I believe that it will make them less likely to prompt their child and support them at home in a way they may have before. If a psychic tells you that you will meet your soul mate aged 25, would you bother looking for love aged 20?

There is much research against this study, saying that we should be starting children reading later, not earlier. Laura Grace Weldon writes about “Reading Readiness” and how we should be giving children more opportunities to learn from life, to learn from exploring rather than from sitting at a desk reading (article available at https://lauragraceweldon.com/2012/08/07/reading-readiness-has-to-do-with-the-body/). She notes that children have 25% less free time than they had a generation ago (taken from http://www.americantrails.org/resources/kids/CNNresearch07.html). We have children sitting in school all day, and in many cases sitting doing homework or reading school chosen books at night. While reading does unlock a lot of other subjects in school, I agree that there is a lot of pressure on children to read certain books in order to achieve reading success. This attitude can actually be detrimental in affecting the attitudes of children towards reading. If children are being pushed into books they do not want to read, then they will have no motivation to read them, and, eventually, no motivation to read.

There are some studies that actually argue that children do not need to be taught to read – they will simply teach themselves. Gray (2010, available at https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201002/children-teach-themselves-read) looked at non-teaching schools and particularly the reading ability of the children. He found that children were able to teach themselves to read. They all appeared to have their own strategy, with no correlations showing between students. This method ensures that children are learning in the best way for them and are able to choose their own books with no reading scheme to follow.

I find myself leaning more towards the argument of Laura Grace Weldon. Young children do not need to sit at a desk in order to learn. Children learn from feeling, doing, exploring. The great outdoors has a mass of teaching opportunities for young children, and I believe that teachers are not taking advantage of the wonder that lies outwith the classroom walls. During my teaching career, I would love to be able to explore this more and show children that they do not need to have their nose in a book to be learning.

I want a pig for breakfast!

Leave a reply

While Chomsky believed that children are born with an innate capacity for language, other theorists such as Bruner and Vygotsky believed that language was developed in social situations, by interacting with others. This begins early on in the child’s life, talking to parents/carers and other family members, before the child then goes to school and develops their language skills even more by talking to peers, an experience they may not have had at home. Adults therefore play a huge role in affecting the language development of children, especially in the early years.

Talking to children from birth is so important in modelling words for the children to imitate. While language acquisition cannot solely happen through imitation (this theory does not account for misuse of grammar such as “I goed”, which you can often hear children say), it cannot be denied that it is a crucial step in a child’s language development. Unfortunately, I have seen lots of new parents pushing their child in a pram/buggy with one hand, and the other hand attached to a phone. I do not judge these people, I do not know them, but in terms of a child’s development, they are missing out on crucial attention from an adult who should be helping them to make sense of the mystical world around them. This is an example of how adults can inhibit the development of children’s language.

In the clip below, we see Niaz, a 3 year old child in nursery beginning to make sense of many of the complex words and rules of the English language.

https://www.sirenfilms.co.uk/excerpt-from-supporting-early-literacy-niaz-draws-a-list/

When Niaz begins playing with other children, he quickly finds that they are not giving him the attention that he wants and seeks this attention from an adult. This is because children at this age are still quite egocentric, and believe that they are the centre of the world which revolves solely around them.

The adult in this situation is a good example of how adults should support children in their language development. She uses lots of praise when talking to the children and has a clear, consistent voice that is easy for the children to understand and model. She knows that the children will model what she says – when Niaz gives Stephen some paper she says “Thank you Niaz” which the children will pick up on and eventually internalize as correct manners. Even though she has to monitor other children, the adult gives Niaz lots of attention – this will make Niaz feel more confident and want to continue talking as he feels listened to.

The adult also asks lots of prompting questions in an attempt to get Niaz talking more and answering them i.e. “What do we need the pencils for?” When she asks him this, you can hear that Niaz is wanting to say “list” but is getting stuck on the ‘l’. The adult continues to prompt Niaz which results in him being able to communicate what he is wanting to do. If the adult had given up at this point, Niaz would have lost confidence, inhibiting his language development.

When they begin writing the list, the adult uses pictures to signify objects they will recognise from everyday life – such as cereal and milk. When Niaz begins his list, he draws a pig with quite a few too many legs. Rather than correct this, the adult praises Niaz for his attempt, getting the rough shapes correct. Niaz then draws a picture of himself. The adult then tells him that then we will know that it is his list. This is the beginnings of teaching ownership and certain words such as ‘mine’, ‘his/hers’ and ‘yours’.

The role of an adult in terms of language development is to encourage children, using lots of praise even if what the child says isn’t quite correct. If an adult is constantly correcting and berating a child for incorrect pronunciation or grammar, the child will lose confidence and will eventually stop trying. We must remember that children are just beginners in language – it will take several years for them to master this complex skill. It is important that adults spend the time talking to children at this early stage. Even if you think they do not understand what you are saying, they may really be internalizing every word.

(All images are screenshots taken from the video hyperlinked above.)

“Tough guys don’t do math. Tough guys fry chicken for a living.”

6 Replies

Stand and Deliver (1988) is a film following teacher Jaime Escalante as he teaches a class of mainly Hispanic students in a fairly impoverished school/community. He has a radical teaching style much different from the norm of teachers across the globe, where he frequently makes fun of children and has a ‘no tolerance’ policy for anything less than perfect.

Real Jaime Escalante with Edward James Olmos, the actor who played him in the film. Picture courtesy of http://www.olmosperfect.com/stand-and-deliver.html

Escalante, born in Bolivia in 1930, became one of the most famous educators in America, moving there in pursuit of a better life. As shown in this film, he taught disadvantaged pupils, whom some teachers had given up on completely, and managed to have a handful pass an extremely difficult Calculus test. Escalante’s success has earned him many accolades, including being entered into the National Teachers Hall of Fame in 1999.

It is interesting to analyse Escalante’s teaching style in the film as it is far from conventional. He does not accept poor behaviour, and even why one student, Angel, walks out of the class, he merely says goodbye rather than chasing after him. Escalante is more concerned about the children who want to learn and believes that it is a privilege to be in his class. The children respect their teacher and want to do well for him. While his teaching style may be considered to be scaring his pupils into working hard, I believe he does this with a true sense of compassion and care for the future of these children. This caring nature is highlighted in the scene where Escalante gives Angel 3 textbooks – one for class, one for home and one for his locker – as he did not want to be seen carrying them around. This compromise can be useful in the classroom as it encourages conversation between teacher and student, rather than a one sided lecture from the teacher, which can cause the students to disengage.

When looking at specific teaching points in the film, it is clear that there are lessons to be learned from Escalante’s teaching. For example, a quote from the film that resonates with me is “Students will rise to the level of expectation”. It is crucial that teachers have high expectations for their students as it shows a confidence in them that they may not have themselves. I hope to remember this along my teaching journey.

Another example is how to help the children understand what he is teaching them, he uses language and problems that make sense to them – he gives the problems a sense of relevance. One example of this is when he uses numbers of girlfriends in a problem (see the below clip).

Using girlfriends instead of other objects such as apples or pens engages the children, making them laugh and therefore creating a relaxed classroom atmosphere where the pupils are confident in answering questions. Another example is where the pupils ask the real life benefit of learning these things and their teacher takes them on a trip to show them exactly how that maths is used in the real world. This idea links to the principle of relevance within the Curriculum for Excellence (Scottish Executive 2004, p15).

It is important that we teach children why they are learning things. While this seems to be an accepted part of the curriculum, maths, in my opinion, seems to miss this principle. In a broader sense, you can often hear students, especially at high school, saying “Where’s the point in this? When will this ever help me in real life?” This shows a distinct lack of teacher communication with the children about why they are learning these topics. In terms of more basic level mathematics, learners need to know what all these different rules and formulas actually mean. Pupils could be given rules and memorize them, which tends to be the case, however, they have no true understanding of why. This may be the case because many teachers themselves do not know the reason why, as they have been taught just to memorize the rules, therefore getting trapped in an endless cycle of knowing but not understanding.

I believe that I myself fall into the above category. While I enjoy maths and teaching it, I would say that I do not have a depth of knowledge in why maths happens. I hope to look into areas of mathematics in more depth in order to improve my knowledge of maths and my ability to teach it to a strong degree.

References

Biography.com Editors (2014) Jaime Escalante Biography. Available at: http://www.biography.com/people/jaime-escalante-189368 (Accessed: 15/09/16).

Scottish Executive (2004) A Curriculum for Excellence. Available at: http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/26800/0023690.pdf (Accessed on 15/09/16)

4 Weeks Later and Still Alive

1 Reply

I have recently finished my first year placement in a primary 3/4 class whom I have thoroughly enjoyed teaching.

Naturally, my highlight has been passing my placement with all sections marked as satisfactory. This is the product of my hard work and commitment over the past 4 weeks, and I am so proud to have passed first year. In terms of lessons I thoroughly enjoyed the music lesson where we created sound stories related to our rainforest topic. Although their finished products did not really resemble a story about the rainforest, I was proud of my behaviour management in this lesson. I set out clear expectations at the start of the lesson that if anyone played while I was talking their instrument would be removed and they would have to sit out. This worked well as all children wanted to continue playing the instruments. I believe this to have been my biggest achievement in terms of behaviour management and I thoroughly enjoyed the lesson.

Confidence

At the beginning of this placement, I was unsure about my teaching ability as I had never been responsible for a whole class before, hence making confidence one of my goals. Looking back over placement I can see my confidence has improved hugely. There are clear links to behaviour management, which has either positively or negatively affected my confidence. There have been occasions where my behaviour management should have been better, and hence this has affected my confidence. My confidence has been highest when teaching the children their dance for the UNICEF show. I was tentative about this to begin with, however, I am proud of what the children can remember and what they have achieved.

Differentiation

As the class has such diverse needs and abilities, differentiation was made my second goal. There is one child at second level, one at early level and a vast range of children from first developing to first consolidating in between. My ability to differentiate by task has improved vastly this placement, as at the beginning I really struggled to get things right for each child. Now I am more comfortable with knowing what each child is capable of. In terms of differentiation by support, I feel that I could work on this a bit more. I need to give children a range of activities that they can get on with themselves so that I can work with those children who need more support. This is something that I am developing and can see strengths in, however, it still needs improved. Waterhouse (1990) notes that this is achieved by finding a “balance of independence” for each child (p15). This week I was particularly happy with my differentiation during my lesson on the tribes of the rainforest. When comparing their life to a tribal child’s the children had differentiated passages and I sat with those who would struggle to read the passage themselves. I believe this has been a strong point in my differentiation.

Planning – SPR 2.1.3 Have knowledge and understanding of planning coherent and progressive teaching programmes

This was my first time creating lesson plans, and naturally I was worried about getting it right, especially my learning intentions and success criteria, as these are critical to any lesson. Looking back now I can see a massive improvement in the quality of my lesson plans. They are now much more detailed, which has in turn improved my confidence and is something I will take forward to 3PP1. I am more comfortable with the curriculum, particularly the experiences and outcomes (Scottish Government 2009), and am happier with writing learning intentions and success criteria.

Assessment – SPR 2.1.5 Have knowledge and understanding of the principles of assessment, recording and reporting

I believe my knowledge and understanding of assessment methods, especially AiFL has been improving towards the end of my placement, although is something to work on in future. I have used thumbs to gauge the children’s understanding and have used summative assessment marking their work and leaving comments. In the past week I have particularly been trying to use no hands up and wait time, however, I believe this could still be improved as it is not brilliant. I have marked most of their language and maths work and have been using this marking in following lessons to see who needs more help.

Behaviour Management

I have been using dojo points more towards the end of my placement as a behaviour management strategy. The children really enjoy getting points, and dislike having points taken off them, therefore Class Dojo is always up on the computer for easy access. I have also been moving children to my feet on carpet as Smith (1979, cited in Robertson 1996) notes that the closer you are to a problem or target group of children, the more effective you are at managing their behaviour.

Looking ahead to 3PP1, I believe my goal of differentiation should carry forward as this still needs more work. I will also make behaviour management one of my goals as that is something I have struggled with this placement, alongside assessment.

References

GTCS (2012) The Standards for Registration: Mandatory requirements for Registration with the General Teaching Council for Scotland. Available at: http://www.gtcs.org.uk/web/FILES/the-standards/standards-for-registration-1212.pdf (Accessed 14/5/16)

Robertson, J. (1996) Effective Classroom Control. 3^rd edn. London: Hodder and Stroughton Educational.

Scottish Government (2009) Curriculum for Excellence, Experiences and outcomes for all curriculum areas. Available at: http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/Images/all_experiences_outcomes_tcm4-539562.pdf (Accessed on 14/5/16)

Waterhouse, P. (1990) Classroom Management. Stafford: Network Educational Press.

My computer has taken over my life!

3 Replies

The use of computers in the classroom is becoming increasingly more widespread. IWB are in most classrooms now as a teaching tool and computers, even iPads have been introduced for children to work on.

While I believe that the internet is a wonderful resource to find information and share ideas with other members of the teaching profession and beyond, I also believe that their use in the classroom is growing out of control. Children do enjoy using technology, as I have experienced while out on placement recently, however, there are so many other parts of the curriculum in which computers are resorted to for teaching.

Can we as a profession no longer use creativity to think up exciting lessons? Children in years to come are unlikely to remember a computer project, they will remember lessons which engaged and involved them. I am not saying that computers should be scrapped from classrooms completely, merely that they should be used in proportion.

From my time at primary school, I can only remember tasks which were active in involving and engaging me – in primary 7 we built a life size Anderson Shelter and decorated the cupboard to look like the inside of one. It taught us how cramped conditions were during air raids without even looking at a computer. Although this was quite a few years ago, and computers were only just beginning to be used in the classroom, I think the case would be the same for children in the classroom today.

Therefore, I ask the question, would modern teachers manage without computers in thinking up, finding resources for and conducting lessons? I believe they could, but how many would do it?

Lunchtime Lunacy

Leave a reply

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/parents-could-forced-pay-children-7357886?ICID=FB_mirror_main

I found this article while scrolling through social media a few days ago, and was appalled by what I read. A council in South Wales are proposing to charge parents for sending their children to school with a packed lunch due to the amount that it is costing them for the clean up of these lunches. This is budget cutting to ridiculous extremes.

There are parents who simply cannot afford to pay for school lunches, hence why they give their children a packed lunch. While some may argue that that is the reason for Free School Meals (FSM) benefit, however, not all families who are entitled to FSM claim them, sometimes through ignorance to the fact that they are entitled.

When reading through some comments on the site, it is clear that I am not the only one appalled by this proposal. Many others who have read the article have also noted that it is some schools’ policy for the children to take their rubbish home, which allows parents to monitor what they eat at lunchtime. If this is the case, it makes it even harder to see the reason behind this proposed “Sandwich tax”, even if the council are saving money.

This proposal enrages me, and while it will apparently save the council £174,000 a year, it would be interesting to see where that money will end up. I do not think that it is fair to pass costs on to parents because of budget cuts.

Sit Down and Shut up

2 Replies

I’m sure it would not be too hard for us all to think back to a teacher who had a very “sit down and shut up” attitude, and these would often be teachers whose subjects I tended to like less.

In the classrooms of the past, it was clear that the teacher was in control and no talking or movement would be tolerated. However, this should not be the case in modern day classrooms. Teachers should be open and enthusiastic, and group discussions are promoted rather than seen as a nuisance.

In terms of behaviour management, the following video analyses the way in which 5 teachers engage and control their class without any need for forceful language or gestures.

Boost Your Teaching

How do they help maintain the attention of the children? – The teachers all make use of movement and hand gestures to engage their class and keep them focused on the task at hand. They move around the classroom in order to keep engagement across the class, which ensures that those sitting at the back listen and contribute as they know the teacher will come over to them. The hand gestures they use are very open and keep the children’s attention.

How do they show respect for the children? – It is clear that all of the teacher’s respect their children. They do not raise their voice or shout at the children, and they use positive praise, smiling when the children answer a question correctly. In particular in this video, the history teacher is given wrong answers, however, he does not make the children feel bad about these answers, he simply helps them to work through the wrong answer as to why it is not what he is looking for.

How do they show the authority of the teacher? – All of the teachers in the video show a commanding presence in the classroom, although it is warm and inviting at the same time. They refuse to talk over children, as demonstrated by the geography teacher, and use their authority to move around the class, ensuring that all children are involved and engaged.

How do the teachers manage the movement of the children? – As shown by the PSHE teacher, the children enter the class in single file rather than in bunches, which calms the children down after any high energy occurrences that may have happened outside the classroom. This is also reinforcing the teachers authority. At the end of the lesson, shown by the geography teacher, it is important to let the children go in groups/tables as this avoids a chaotic scramble towards the door.

I believe that the ideas in this video, while based in a high school, will work well in the primary school setting. The need to include positive praise is essential, especially with younger children, who have a shorter attention span, and need some form of constant engagement. It is also useful to note how your stance as a teacher can either invite pupils to learn with you, or switch them off completely. For example, folding your arms creates a barrier which the children may feel they need to fight or break in order to form a good relationship with their teacher, which is the first step to effective learning. This can lead to poor behaviour in the class, and the teacher may not understand why without this knowledge of effective stance and body language.

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this: