Room 13 is an arts initiative that began in Fort William in 1994. The children of Caol Primary School were asked to produce words, letters and number made out of clay and they would later take pictures of them. Unfortunately, I was not able copy in the photograph from the presentation.
The pupils felt that school, in particular Art, was too easy and adverse to difficulty and so Room 13 was created. By taking the school photographs, this allowed the funds to be kept in house.
They have since transformed into a global uprising of creative an entrepreneurial children who are responsible for growing an international network of student-organised art studios (Gibb, 2012).
As teachers, we can gain encouragement from Room 13’s theories and pedagogies. As currently, the methods utilized for teaching the arts are becoming increasingly formulated and strategic, which is constricting creativity (Gibb, 2012). Compliance to a set of ‘past practices’ and ‘orthodoxies’ (Atkinson, 2005, Hickman, 2005) that privileges technical skills and teacher-led pedagogies at the expense of creativity and more pupil-led pedagogy which privileges free expressive modes of thinking and making (McAuliffe, 2013).
Adopting Room 13’s pedagogy that we learned about in our lecture within our workshop, enabled us to see the outcome that when you allow choice, you get individuality.
We were able to test this theory within our visual arts workshop by having Diarmuid ask us create a paintbrush out of materials such as witties, wool and wire. He then described a picture to us and we had to create our own painting using his description only using the primary colours.
Being able to link theory and practice about arts education has been valuable for enhancing my skills , as before this module when teaching I would have expected children to most likely copy either painting or pictures and the pupils will have ended up with the same result (see picture below). It is not a skill I am comfortable with yet, but hope to continue to develop this throughout the module.
We were also allowed to utilize choice in our drama workshop. We were focusing on using drama as an integrated approach to topic work, mostly focusing on history and controversy. By first discussing topics and looking at images relating to them, such as, the Me Too movement and WW2, allowed us to get into the mind frame of how certain characters may have been feeling.
I found this helpful as the drama conventions, (mime, monologue, voices in the head and slow motion) this week were quite difficult. In groups, we created role plays based on the two topics mentioned above adopting different conventions. Acting out these topics, I felt as though I was being disrespectful. Although, I do understand the need to teach children about these past and present issues and drama can be a good way to implement it.
Reference List
Gibb, C. (2012) Room 13: The Movement and International Network. International Journal of Art & Design Education. [online] Vol 31.3, p237. Available: http://www.nsead.org/publications/ijadearticle.aspx?id=809 [Accessed: 26th September 2019].
McAuliffe, D (2013) Art and Design Education. In T. Bryce and W. Humes (et al eds.) Scottish Education (4th Edition): Referendum, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.