Differential decoding – unintented consequences

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finding_Nemo#Environmental_concerns_and_consequences

Environmental concerns and consequences

The film’s use of clownfish prompted mass purchase of the fish breed as pets in the United States, even though the story portrayed the use of fish as pets negatively and suggested that saltwater aquariums are notably tricky and expensive to maintain.[58] The demand for clownfish was supplied by large-scale harvesting of tropical fish in regions like Vanuatu.[59] The Australian Tourism Commission (ATC) launched several marketing campaigns in China and the United States to improve tourism in Australia, many of them utilizing Finding Nemo clips.[60][61]Queensland used Finding Nemo to draw tourists to promote its state for vacationers.[62] According to National Geographic, “Ironically, Finding Nemo, a movie about the anguish of a captured clownfish, caused home-aquarium demand for them to triple.”[63]

The reaction to the film by the general public has led to environmental devastation for the clownfish, and has provoked an outcry from several environmental protection agencies, including the Marine Aquarium Council, Australia. The demand for tropical fish skyrocketed after the film’s release, causing reef species decimation in Vanuatu and many other reef areas.[64] After seeing the film, some aquarium owners released their pet fish into the ocean, but failed to release them into the correct oceanic habitat, which introduced species that are harmful to the indigenous environment, a practice that is harming reefs worldwide.

Representation: Women in Power

http://player.stv.tv/programmes/tonight-spotlight-sturgeon/

Nippy Sweetie or consummate politician?

How did/does she present herself? Look at hair/make-up/weight/clothing/with her husband/in front of the audience at an event.

Look at how the press re-present her.

Does that help or harm her case?

Is she a victim of sexism or is she benefitting from it?

Does she seem “real”/like you? How does she do this?

How does the programme maker manage to appear neutral?

Do they ask any hard questions?

Do they present an opposing view?

Would this programme influence you to vote one way or another? Why?

Remember the Christopher Jeffries case?

Bear that in mind as you read reports on the disappearance of the 24 year old girl in Glasgow.  At each stage of the story which media organisations are reporting responsibly and which ones are using implication/conjecture? What is being done which would be helpful to the Police or a hindrance to an official investigation? What need is the media trying to meet – what does each target audience want? What is the media really trying to do? Why does one – or more – news organisation reveal information that others choose not to? In whose interests are they acting?

Keep an eye on the following organisations:

Mail Online

Daily Record

BBC Online News

BBC News (National and Local)

STV News

Which ones reveal very little/which ones reveal too much?  Why are they acting in this way? Which ones are funded through sales? Licence fees? Pay-per-click?

Compare this with Twitter and other social media.

Is social media forcing the hand of more traditional organisations?

Newsbeat

BBC Online News

Daily Mail

Daily Record

Twitter

Facebook – Police page

Supported Study

If you want the notes on marketing the Hunger Games, they are available on Edmodo. It might be interesting to compare TSR’s way of generating profit compared with THG with the nearly two decade difference between them.

Those of you who missed today and were off on the last day of term, there are Godfather notes in my room. Remember to ask for a copy.

Report a Glow concern
Cookie policy  Privacy policy

Glow Blogs uses cookies to enhance your experience on our service. By using this service or closing this message you consent to our use of those cookies. Please read our Cookie Policy.