Category Archives: Social Studies Portfolio

Fieldwork

In the social studies elective we have been looking at the importance of fieldwork and taking children outdoors to enhance learning. Foley and Janukoun (1992) and Pickford, Garner and Jackson (2013) define fieldwork as the field being the place where the learning is taking place and fieldwork being the activities taking place there. They also both suggest that fieldwork allows for a bridge to be made between the classroom and the wider world. There are three types of fieldwork Pickford, Garner and Jackson (2013, p.48) discuss, these are the “look and see” style; when the children go somewhere such as a museum, and a guide or teacher provide information regarding what is on display, second is “field teaching”; when children are active in the learning but are limited in using their own enquiry and third is “enquiry based fieldwork”; when children are allowed to explore and construct their own learning. Job (1996) cited in Owen and Ryan (2001) agrees with Pickford, Garner and Jackson (2013) suggestion for the three types of fieldwork that can take place, but he believed there are a further two. Job (1996) cited in Owen and Ryan (2001, p.105) believes another type of fieldwork that could be used is “discovery learning”; where children are exposed to an environment in which they will learn a variety of things which have not been planned by the teacher and secondly he believes fieldwork could take the form of “earth education”; meaning children can use the environment to develop understanding through using games and role-play.  Job (1996) cited in Owen and Ryan (2001) and Pickford, Garner and Jackson (2013) give a definition of fieldwork and the types of fieldwork we could use in the primary classroom, but the key discussion is in what ways can fieldwork enhance children’s understanding of the world through teaching and learning within social studies.

Catling and Willy (2009), Pickford, Garner and Jackson (2013) and Witt (2013) all agree that fieldwork brings learning alive, making it more interesting for children helping to enhance their understanding of the world around them. They also all agree that fieldwork helps to develop a wide range of skills but one skill in particular it helps to build is enquiry, they believe that fieldwork motivates learners and encourage them to ask questions. Harnett and Whitehouse (2017) take this point slight further and suggest that fieldwork allows children to have an opportunity for free exploration to develop their investigative, examination and questioning skills. Catling and Willy (2009), Pickford, Garner and Jackson (2013) and Witt (2013) all agree that ultimately fieldwork creates some of the most exciting and memorable learning experiences for children, hence why it is believed it enhances their knowledge, understanding and skills development within social studies. Pickford, Garner and Jackson (2013) discuss what they believe to be the biggest advantages of using fieldwork to enhance learning, these are; it makes learning accessible for all pupils, it provides new opportunities and context for children to practice their enquiry and investigation skills and it allows for quality learning experiences which help to raise academic achievement across subjects. However, Catling and Willy (2009) debate this, they do not disagree with Pickford, Garner and Jackson (2013), however they make a very valid point, they suggest that these advantages can only be achieved if a teacher is clear on what they want to achieve from the visits and the outcomes these related to, meaning that fieldwork must not just be for fun but the educational context and value must be explicitly clear.

To discover how fieldwork can enhance learning I decided to go to Dundee’s new V&A Museum to find out if this would be a useful place to develop knowledge and understanding in social studies. There are many areas of the curriculum that can be explored through a fieldwork at the V&A, particularly in relation to social studies as the children would be able to develop their understanding of areas of Scottish history. The children would take part in “enquiry-based fieldwork” (Job, 1996 cited in Owen and Ryan 2001, p.105; Pickford, Garner and Jackson, 2013, p.48) as they would have opportunity to explore the museum and the artefacts on display, to observe and question the artefacts they find interesting. There would also be an opportunity for “look and see” fieldwork (Job, 1996 cited in Owen and Ryan, 2001, p.105; Pickford, Garner and Jackson, 2013, p.48) as a member of staff from the V&A would take the children around the artefacts showing significant events in Scottish history and explain to the children what they are and how they came to be in the museum. Children would also have opportunity to develop their investigative and questioning skills through the education workshops that are available at the V&A. When planning a trip to the V&A Museum to develop children’s knowledge and understanding of Scottish History I would be using this as an introduction to the topic, I would provide the children with a means of taking photographs and ask them to photograph areas of the museum they find most interesting and would like to investigate further. I would encourage them to ask lots of questions during the visit to help develop their initial enquires. From this, on the return to school, there would be a class discussion and a vote upon an area of Scottish History the class found most interesting during the visit and would like to learn more about. This would then lead the direction of the enquiry and the children will investigate further into this area and develop their understating of this event, its impact and how it has influenced life today. Pickford, Garner and Jackson (2013) give an example of using fieldwork to a museum before beginning an area of learning just as I have explained, they suggest that doing this helps to create questions and an initial hypothesis. From there the children can do research and use other resources to test their hypothesis and find the answers to their questions (Pickford, Garner and Jackson, 2013).

Taking part in fieldwork should encourage children to develop their understanding of the world and their place within in it as citizens, they should seek to enquire about what they see; investigating, making connections and asking questions (Pickford, Garner and Jackson, 2013). Fieldwork allows children to learn through enquiry, to develop their understanding of the world through an engaging and memorable learning experience (Hoodless, 2009; Catling and Willy, 2009; Witt, 2013).

 

References:

Catling, S. and Willy, T. (2009) Teaching Primary Geography. Exeter: Learning Matters.

Foley, M. and Janikoun, J. (1992) The Really Practical Guide to Primary Geography. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.

Harnett, P. and Whitehouse, S. (2017) ‘Creative Exploration of Local, National and Global Links’ in Cooper, H. (ed.) Teaching History Creatively. 2nd edn. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 157 – 170

Hoodless, P. (2009) Teaching Humanities in Primary Schools. Exeter: Learning Matters.

Owen, D. and Ryan, A. (2001) Teaching Geography 3-11 The Essential Guide. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Pickford, T. Garner, W. and Jackson, E. (2013) Primary Humanities: Learning Through Enquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications

Witt, S. (2017) ‘Playful Approaches to Learning Outdoors’, in Scoffham, S. (ed.) Teaching Geography Creatively. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 47 – 58.

Emotional and Controversial History

I have taken the social studies module this year as I was never overly engaged with history and geography at school. I remember very little about what social studies topics I done at primary school, the only one I do remember is the Vikings and that was because the teacher used to bring the shared TV in and we would watch some videos (I remember thinking it was amazing getting to watch TV in school). Apart from this my experiences are very limited and so I have taken this module to develop my understanding and discover ways in which I could make teaching of social studies in the classroom more relevant and enjoyable.

On the first week of the social studies elective we had an introduction to the history aspect of the module looking at why we teach history in the primary classroom. We were looking at what skills and knowledge we should develop through the teaching of history and we were advised to read The T.E.A.C.H Report which was published by the Historical Association in 2007. The report focused on the importance of teaching emotional and controversial historical issues, it stated that “The study of history can be emotive and controversial where there is actual or perceived unfairness to people by another individual or group in the past. This may also be the case where there are disparities between what is taught in school history, family/community history and other histories. Such issues and disparities create a strong resonance with students in particular educational settings.” (Historical Association, 2007, p 4). The report states to have good practice when teaching emotive and controversial history teachers must;

  • Have a clear purpose and rational that emphasises identity, values and diversity.
  • Teach history as both a body and form of knowledge.
  • Allow for independent inquiry.
  • Provide time and opportunity to reflect and cover different perspectives and beliefs.
  • Explore different narratives and the past from different perspectives.
  • Expose learners to large variety of sources.

(Historical Association, 2007)

However, the report stated that many teachers refrain from teaching emotive and controversial history due to their lack of subject knowledge (Historical Association, 2007). However, Hoodles (2008) debates this, they suggest that teachers often think they know little about a particular historical subject but when they are given time to think about it they do know a lot about it, they just don’t know where they learned it. Furthermore, the report suggests teachers refrain from teaching emotional and controversial history as they feel certain issues are not appropriate for certain age groups (Historical Association, 2007). Even though the report is seen to be critiquing teachers for not teaching emotional and controversial history to younger pupils I can fully understand why they don’t. It is my opinion that it is not appropriate to teach young children about brutal wars and mass death, I believe if we teach emotional and controversial history then it should be age appropriate and we should ensure what we are teaching does not majorly upset or offend any of our pupils. The report does recognise this point and states if teachers were provided with more guidance and encouragement then they would be able to improve the teaching and learning of emotional and controversial history and have a better understanding of what they could potentially teach and to what stage (Historical Association, 2007).

I struggle to think of what emotive and controversial history I studied while at primary school, I think the closest I got was studying World War Two and watching Goodnight Mr Tom. As much as this was emotive, I feel there could have been a lot more emotive and controversial issues explored through the context of World War 2. I hope in my teaching I can find a winder variety of contexts to explore emotional and controversial history, but I would also like to explore the emotional and controversial issues of today’s society and make the links between the two.

References

Historical Association (2007) The T.E.A.C.H Report. Available at: https://www.history.org.uk/secondary/resource/780/the-teach-report (Accessed on: 14th September 2018)

Hoodless, P. (2008) Teaching History in Primary Schools. Exeter: Learning Matters.