Monthly Archives: February 2016

Classroom Organisation and Management

I was given the task to design a classroom layout for a class of 28 pupils; 23 boys and 5 girls. This is the classroom layout I designed;

Picture1

I would really like to have a smart board and a white board so that demonstrations can take place in different areas of the classroom. I have heard of many schools bringing in iPads or tablets for their pupils and I think this is a great idea! This fits in with the GTCS SFR: 2.1.4 Have knowledge and understanding of contexts for learning to fulfil their responsibilities in literacy, numeracy, health and wellbeing and interdisciplinary learning and 3.1.3 Employ a range of teaching strategies and resources to meet the needs and abilities of learners . By using the tablets, lessons can be even more interactive and may make the pupils feel more relaxed and comfortable if it reminds them of the experiences they have at home.   I think it is important to have quite a lot of the desks facing the Smart Board as this is probably one of the most used classroom resources and so saves the children craning their necks. Beside the Smart Board there is a list of classroom rules, therefore, whilst the children are looking at the front they can be reminded of what is expected of them. At the start of the school year the class could discuss/suggest this list of rules and this list being beside the Smart Board means that I can easily point to it to remind the pupils of the rules we agreed on. This comes under the GTCS SFR: 3.2.2 Develop positive relationships and positive behaviour strategies and 3.1.5 Work effectively in partnership in order to promote learning and wellbeing.

I have arranged the tables so that the pupils will hopefully have a good view of both the White board and the Smart Board. I think that the ‘L’ shape of the tables will enable the teacher to move around smoothly and be able to reach any child easily who may need help etc.

I placed the teacher’s desk at the side near the back so that I have a good view of all the pupils in the classroom .Beside the teacher’s desk is a white board because I know that they are a common feature in classrooms and I think that they are practically very handy. They can be used, for example, to remind one group of the work they should be doing whilst the other board is used. I also placed the desk in between the Interactive Learning Zone and the Quiet Zone so that I can easily keep an eye on these areas and make sure that they are being used properly.

There is a Quiet Zone at the front right of the class. This is an area where children can come to ‘cool down’, have a ‘time out’ or do some silent reading. It could also be used to gather a smaller group in the class to teach. This comes under the GTCS SFR:3.2.1 Create a safe, caring and purposeful learning environment.  It is opposite the Interactive Learning Zone at the back of the classroom. Since the majority of the class are boys, I thought that it was important to have an area where they could come and do some practical, hands-on learning. This area will be filled with different resources, such as building blocks, number games and  a range of other tasks. This fits in with the GTCS SFR: 3.1.3 Employ a range of teaching strategies and resources to meet the needs and abilities of learners .

There is also a ‘finished work tasks’ board for pupils to give them options other than just silent reading/ Interactive Learning Zone when they are finished their work. This will contain tasks such as quiz questions, poster ideas and crosswords etc. which the pupils can complete at their desks. This will  prevent the Interactive Learning Zone and the Quiet Zone from becoming too overcrowded.  All three areas are placed very far apart to prevent overcrowding. This comes under the GTCS SFR: 3.2.1 Create a safe, caring and purposeful learning environment.

I also want to have a ‘compliment board’ in my classroom. I think it is important to create a positive atmosphere and  a classroom environment where children know that they are accepted for who they are. If they have confidence in themselves, then mkorsakov_-__this will hopefully influence their motivation to learn and to work hard. Also, in today’s society , there is a pressure among males in particular to keep  their feelings bottled up and to not show any emotion. There is a pressure among both genders to look and act a certain way. By creating this safe environment, I hope that it will encourage the pupils to be trusting and open to sharing if anything is bothering them. This also fits in with the GTCS SFR: 3.2.1 Create a safe, caring and purposeful learning environment.

Around the walls I will have examples of all of the pupils’ work to show them that they should be proud and to really make it feel like it is ‘their’ place. There will be a welcome board containing some information about each pupil (which they will write them selves). This is so that visitors can find out more about the class and so that each pupil knows that they are an important member of the class. I will have an achievements wall which will be updated regularly. There will also be an information board near the door containing, for example, registration notices and lunch menus. This is so that pupils can check it as they come in and so that they are reminded that they are in a classroom and so they are reminded of what is expected of them.

 

 

Intertwining drama into lessons

Phillip_Pess_ As a child, I used to love putting on dramatic performances, whether it was in front of the school in the Christmas plays, or simply in front of my family in the comfort of my own home. I loved going to the drama club at my Church every week and secretly dreamt of one day being an actress (who knows, there’s still time).

The great thing about drama is that it is so versatile! It can be easily applied and shaped into any subject. It is a way of reinforcing what the pupils have been learning. Speaking from experience, I know that drama can bring a topic to life and can make learning fun and interactive. There are many different ways to integrate drama into a lesson; it can be used as a summary of a lesson, as a way to develop the class’ peer assessment skills or as a relaxing activity at the end of the day. I have researched three conventions with suggestions of how they can be applied in the classroom;

Conscience Alley

This method could be used when looking at a range of subjects. For example, the influences and reasons for alcohol / drug abuse, what different religions would have to say about a particular issue/topic or even simply in readinUmmAbdrahmaa_g when a character has to make a decision. The class forms two lines facing each other. One person walks between the middle of lines as each member of the line gives their advice regarding the situation. This could be done so that each line is giving opposing advice. When the person reaches the end of the tunnel they have to make their decision.

Soundscape

This convention could be used to set the scene of a story being studied in an english lesson. It could also be used to imitate the atmosphere surrounding an important historical event in a history lesson or to recreate the buzz of a city or the peace of the country in a geography lesson. One person acts as a conductor whilst the rest of the class are the ‘orchestra’. Using their voices and bodies, the class tries to create a ‘soundscape’ of a particular theme or mood, for example the seaside, a city, a jungle.

Thought Tracking

This convention would go hand-in-hand in literacy when reading a story or even in a social studies lesson when discussing how a historical figure felt at a significant point. It starts off with a freeze frame then each character in the freeze frame explains how they feel and the situation that they are in.

Scientific Literacy

Last week in Science, we were learning about the concept of ‘Scientific Literacy’. I was surprised at how much more there is to science than just learning the facts and experiments. There is a lot of critical thinking behind it as well which has enabled us to get to the point we are at today. We were asked to write a piece on Scientific Literacy.

The Assessment Criteria was;

AC1 – Explanation of the concept of scientific literacy

AC2 – Analysis of an example where a lack of scientific literacy has led to inaccurate media reporting

AC3 – Discussion of how teaching fair testing in school science links to scientific literacy

AC4 – A carefully researched and referenced paper on scientific literacy

AC1 was written by myself (Laura Clarke), AC2 was written by Lucy Gray, AC3 was written by Colette McEwan and AC4 was completed by Anna Polson.

 

[AC1] According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Scientific literacy is ,’the capacity to use scientific knowledge, to identify questions and to draw evidence-based conclusions in order to understand and help make decisions about the natural world and the changes made to it through human activity’ (OECD, 2003, p133).

Scientific literacy is a step further than just knowing scientific facts; it is applying this knowledge to real life situations. It involves thinking critically about a piece of information and coming to an evidence-based judgement of it.

Rodger Bybee proposed four stages of scientific literacy development. This starts off with ‘Nominal Scientific Literacy’; when a student has some knowledge of scientific vocabulary, but doesn’t understand it and may have some misconceptions about it. Scientific literacy then develops to a ‘Functional’ and then ‘Conceptual’ stage until the pupil reaches a level of ‘Multidimensional Scientific Literacy’; when a student can ‘relate their understanding of concepts and processes and the nature of science in the wider context of science technology and society. It includes philosophical, historical, and social dimensions of science and technology’ (Bybee, 1997, cited in Dunne and Peacock, 2012 , p.84).

Becoming scientifically literate is one of the aims of the curriculum for excellence, ‘The experiences and outcomes in science provide opportunities for children and young people to develop and practise a range of inquiry and investigative skills, scientific analytical thinking skills, and develop attitudes and attributes of a scientifically literate citizen’ (Scottish Government, 2004)

[AC2] A famous case of scientific illiteracy in full effect is the MMR jab case. It was feared there was an association between the MMR jab and Autism in the late 1990s this resulted in a decreased number of children receiving jabs for measles mumps and rubella. The Lancet 1998 was the medical journal that suggested the link between the vaccine, autism and bowel disease. (SOURCE: http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/33892/No-MMR-jab-and-autism-link-study) The lack of scientific literacy behind the accusation of the jab caused an uproar amongst the population even prime minister at the time Tony Blair refused to say if his baby also had the jab. (SOURCE: http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/13550/Dangers-of-MMR-jab-covered-up) In more recent studies in which a solid knowledge of scientific literacy is in practice has websites removing the MMR Autism claim. The Advertising Standards Authority said: “We understood that the position held by the World Health Organisation and the Department of Health was that no evidence existed of a causal association between the MMR vaccine and autism or autistic disorders, and that the Cochrane review, looking at the general evidence available, could find no significant association between MMR immunisation and autism. (SOURCE: http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/338290/Website-to-remove-MMR-autism-claim) The fear caused by the uncertainty of MMR vaccine claims created an epidemic amongst the people so strong that the media fed on it and produced many displays of scientific illiteracy.

[AC3] Fair testing is done when carrying out an experiment, you make the test fair by only changing one factor at a time to ensure the results are as accurate and fair as possible. Fair testing highlights that by changing just one factor how the full experiment can change and result in a different outcome. Teaching fair testing in schools is essential and develops scientific literacy as it allows children to not only stop thinking when they get a result, but are able to understand and explain how it works and how they got that result. Teaching fair testing also links to scientific literacy as it ensures children don’t simply accept everything they see or hear, but are able to think critically about situations and challenge them.

 

References

OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development] (2003) The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework – Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills. Paris: OECD.

Dunne, M. and Peacock, A. (eds.) (2012) Primary science: A guide to teaching practice. United Kingdom: SAGE Publications.

Scottish Government, Curriculum for Excellence- Science Principles and Practice. Available at http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/learningandteaching/curriculumareas/sciences/principlesandpractice/index.asp [Last accessed 12/02/2016]